A critical thinking class should be a requirement for all college students, regardless of age. Not only does it help point out fallacious reasoning and logical inconsistencies, it teaches students to identify and recognize various types of arguments and to analyze them based on their own merits - and not necessarily on the emotions or biases of the topics that come up for consideration. Understanding that philosophical papers vary greatly from the run-of-the-mill papers often required for college classes is essential to performing in the class successfully. In my own experience with critical thinking both in and out of the classroom, teaching someone how to think, but not what to think is an essential tool that can be used throughout a student's life, career and future, and makes them more capable of recognizing good and bad arguments, logical fallacies and problems with reasoning that they will encounter in every day life, regardless of the topic at hand. There are several essential components to a Devil's Advocate paper. Understanding these elements and fulfilling their requirements ensures a passing and often exceptional grade, while failing to meet these requirements will often detract from a potentially valid and important premise.
9 Foods that Cause Inflammation and 9 Ways to Fight it
9 Foods that Cause Inflammation and 9 Ways to Fight it « Solluna by Kimberly Snyder
This role has been corrupted of late. This made this person uniquely qualified to understand the nuances of the situation and the argument. Even if they had studied them extensively and thought about them and might even be considered authorities on them, because they were still outside. I can witness the conversation, if invited, I can take notes on it and think about it and roll arguments and counterpoints around in my head, but my place is on the outside. Because I am an outsider.
All too often, groups fail to achieve the storied wisdom of crowds. In recent years, behavioral research has begun to identify precisely where they go wrong. But so far this academic work has yet to have a noticeable effect on actual practice. The two main reasons for error are informational signals some group members receive incorrect signals from other members and reputational pressures people silence themselves or change their views to avoid serious penalties. Since the beginning of human history, people have made decisions in groups.
I read a great blog entry entitled Critical Thinkers vs. Good on you, Dave. Point very well taken. I like how Dave assesses the level of critical thinking applied in the crafting of successful marketing positioning emphasis added :.